Germany rejects Trump’s call for increased military spending

02/05/2025 / By Belle Carter

German Defense Minister Boris Pistorius firmly rejected U.S. President Donald Trump’s call for NATO members to increase military spending to five percent of GDP, stating that it would be financially and politically unfeasible for Germany.
Pistorius highlighted that allocating five percent of GDP to defense would equate to 42 percent of Germany’s federal budget, amounting to €230 billion ($236.5 billion). This would necessitate drastic cuts in essential areas such as education, healthcare and infrastructure, making it an unrealistic proposition.
While acknowledging the need for increased defense investment, Pistorius emphasized the importance of a balanced approach. He stressed the need to communicate threats to citizens and demonstrate the most effective ways to ensure security, underscoring the importance of public support and fiscal responsibility.
Trump’s demand for higher defense spending is part of his broader strategy to recalibrate the U.S. role in global alliances. His transactional approach and warnings about not defending countries that do not meet their financial commitments have heightened tensions within NATO.
Lithuanian President Gitanas Nauseda expressed support for the five percent target, citing ongoing security concerns due to Russia’s actions, particularly in Ukraine. This reflects the persistent geopolitical tensions in Eastern Europe and the varying perspectives within NATO on defense spending and security priorities.

In a firm rebuttal to U.S. President Donald Trump’s demand for NATO member states to increase their military spending to five percent of gross domestic product (GDP), German Defense Minister Boris Pistorius has stated that Berlin cannot and will not allocate nearly half of its federal budget to defense.

The announcement, made in an interview with the Tagesspiegel on Feb. 1, underscores the financial and political challenges Germany faces in balancing its defense commitments with domestic priorities.

Pistorius emphasized that meeting Trump’s demand is simply not feasible for Germany.

“Five percent of our GDP would correspond to 42 percent of the federal budget,” he explained. “That would be almost every second euro spent by the federal government, €230 billion [$236.5 billion]. We could neither afford that nor spend that.”

The minister’s statement highlights the stark reality that such a significant increase in military spending would necessitate drastic cuts in other critical areas such as education, healthcare and infrastructure.

Pistorius acknowledged the need for increased defense spending, stating, “The need to invest more in defense is undisputed.” However, he stressed the importance of a balanced approach.

“It is crucial that we explain to our citizens what threats we face and show them the best possible way to protect ourselves,” he argued. This reflects a broader concern among German policymakers about maintaining public support for defense initiatives while ensuring fiscal responsibility.

Trump’s call for higher defense spending from NATO allies is not new. During his presidency, he repeatedly criticized European countries, including Germany, for not contributing their “fair share” to the alliance. Trump reiterated his stance before his inauguration, insisting that NATO countries should spend five percent of their GDP on defense, not the two percent target that was previously agreed upon. (Related: Trump demanding NATO members spend 5% of GDP on defense – may impose TARIFFS on allies that do not pay up.)

Trump’s pressure on NATO allies was part of a broader strategy to recalibrate the United States’ role in global alliances, often emphasizing a transactional approach to international partnerships. His warnings that the U.S. might not defend countries that do not meet their financial commitments further fueled tensions within the alliance.

In response to Trump’s demands, Lithuanian President Gitanas Nauseda expressed his support for the five percent target during an interview with Newsweek on Thursday.

“You can never feel safe living in this part of the world because we have this neighbor and we will still have it after one hundred or two hundred years,” Nauseda said, referring to Russia. His comments reflect the ongoing security concerns in Eastern Europe, particularly in the wake of Russia’s annexation of Crimea in 2014 and its continued military presence in Ukraine.

Russia’s perspective

Russian President Vladimir Putin has dismissed allegations of his country’s aggressive intentions towards NATO as “nonsense” and “utter rubbish.” In a statement last year, Putin argued that such claims are made by Western politicians to deceive their constituents and justify increased defense spending and aid to Ukraine.

“In Ukraine, we are just protecting ourselves,” he insisted.

Putin’s remarks highlight the complex geopolitical dynamics at play, with Russia viewing NATO’s expansion as a direct threat to its national security. This ongoing tension underscores the importance of dialogue and diplomacy in addressing the security concerns of all parties involved.

While Germany acknowledges the need to increase its defense spending, Pistorius emphasized that the focus should be on “explaining to our citizens what threats we face and showing them the best possible way to protect ourselves.” This approach suggests a commitment to transparency and public engagement in shaping Germany’s defense policy.

Head over to Trump.news for stories related to this.

Watch the video below that talks about Trump’s call for an increase in NATO defense spending.

This video is from the TrendingNews channel on Brighteon.com.

Germany rejects Trump’s call for increased military spending

Russia’s perspective

More related stories:

Sources include:

RECENT NEWS & ARTICLES